↓ Skip to main content

Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
16 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00338
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joerg F. Hipp, Markus Siegel

Abstract

EEG is the most common technique for studying neuronal dynamics of the human brain. However, electromyogenic artifacts from cranial muscles and ocular muscles executing involuntary microsaccades compromise estimates of neuronal activity in the gamma band (>30 Hz). Yet, the relative contributions and practical consequences of these artifacts remain unclear. Here, we systematically dissected the effects of these different artifacts on studying visual gamma-band activity with EEG on the sensor and source level, and show strategies to cope with these confounds. We found that cranial muscle activity prevented a direct investigation of neuronal gamma-band activity at the sensor level. Furthermore, we found prolonged microsaccade-related artifacts beyond the well-known transient EEG confounds. We then show that if electromyogenic artifacts are carefully accounted for, the EEG nonetheless allows for studying visual gamma-band activity even at the sensor level. Furthermore, we found that source analysis based on spatial filtering does not only map the EEG signals to the cortical space of interest, but also efficiently accounts for cranial and ocular muscle artifacts. Together, our results clarify the relative contributions and characteristics of myogenic artifacts confounding visual gamma-band activity in EEG, and provide practical guidelines for future experiments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 2%
United States 5 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 228 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 27%
Researcher 48 20%
Student > Master 38 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 24 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 60 25%
Psychology 49 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 14%
Engineering 19 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 43 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,412,403
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#643
of 7,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,358
of 293,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#105
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.