↓ Skip to main content

What Can the Organization of the Brain’s Default Mode Network Tell us About Self-Knowledge?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Can the Organization of the Brain’s Default Mode Network Tell us About Self-Knowledge?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00391
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph M. Moran, William M. Kelley, Todd F. Heatherton

Abstract

Understanding ourselves has been a fundamental topic for psychologists and philosophers alike. In this paper we review the evidence linking specific brain structures to self-reflection. The brain regions most associated with self-reflection are the posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal (mPFC) cortices, together known as the cortical midline structures (CMSs). We review evidence arguing that self-reflection is special in memory, while noting that these brain regions are often engaged when we think about others in our social worlds. Based on the CMSs' patterns of connectivity and activity, we speculate about three possible interpretations of their role in supporting self-reflection that are somewhat overlapping, and not intended to be mutually exclusive. First, self may be a powerful, but ordinary case for a cognitive system specialized for thinking about people. Second, mPFC may serve as a processing "hub," binding together information from all sensory modalities with internally generated information. Third, mPFC may serve as a cortical director of thought, helping to guide moment-by-moment conscious processing. Suggestions are made for future research avenues aimed at testing such possibilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Spain 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 169 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 20%
Researcher 34 19%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Professor 15 8%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 79 44%
Neuroscience 20 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#680,132
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#317
of 7,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,550
of 280,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#42
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.