↓ Skip to main content

Neural pathways mediating cross education of motor function

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural pathways mediating cross education of motor function
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathy L. Ruddy, Richard G. Carson

Abstract

Cross education is the process whereby training of one limb gives rise to enhancements in the performance of the opposite, untrained limb. Despite interest in this phenomenon having been sustained for more than a century, a comprehensive explanation of the mediating neural mechanisms remains elusive. With new evidence emerging that cross education may have therapeutic utility, the need to provide a principled evidential basis upon which to design interventions becomes ever more pressing. Generally, mechanistic accounts of cross education align with one of two explanatory frameworks. Models of the "cross activation" variety encapsulate the observation that unilateral execution of a movement task gives rise to bilateral increases in corticospinal excitability. The related conjecture is that such distributed activity, when present during unilateral practice, leads to simultaneous adaptations in neural circuits that project to the muscles of the untrained limb, thus facilitating subsequent performance of the task. Alternatively, "bilateral access" models entail that motor engrams formed during unilateral practice, may subsequently be utilized bilaterally-that is, by the neural circuitry that constitutes the control centers for movements of both limbs. At present there is a paucity of direct evidence that allows the corresponding neural processes to be delineated, or their relative contributions in different task contexts to be ascertained. In the current review we seek to synthesize and assimilate the fragmentary information that is available, including consideration of knowledge that has emerged as a result of technological advances in structural and functional brain imaging. An emphasis upon task dependency is maintained throughout, the conviction being that the neural mechanisms that mediate cross education may only be understood in this context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 275 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 20%
Student > Bachelor 43 15%
Student > Master 31 11%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 62 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 49 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 14%
Neuroscience 29 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 85 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,127,109
of 23,509,253 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#522
of 7,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,074
of 284,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#86
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.