↓ Skip to main content

An fMRI study of affective perspective taking in individuals with psychopathy: imagining another in pain does not evoke empathy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
42 X users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
9 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
604 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An fMRI study of affective perspective taking in individuals with psychopathy: imagining another in pain does not evoke empathy
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00489
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Decety, Chenyi Chen, Carla Harenski, Kent A. Kiehl

Abstract

While it is well established that individuals with psychopathy have a marked deficit in affective arousal, emotional empathy, and caring for the well-being of others, the extent to which perspective taking can elicit an emotional response has not yet been studied despite its potential application in rehabilitation. In healthy individuals, affective perspective taking has proven to be an effective means to elicit empathy and concern for others. To examine neural responses in individuals who vary in psychopathy during affective perspective taking, 121 incarcerated males, classified as high (n = 37; Hare psychopathy checklist-revised, PCL-R ≥ 30), intermediate (n = 44; PCL-R between 21 and 29), and low (n = 40; PCL-R ≤ 20) psychopaths, were scanned while viewing stimuli depicting bodily injuries and adopting an imagine-self and an imagine-other perspective. During the imagine-self perspective, participants with high psychopathy showed a typical response within the network involved in empathy for pain, including the anterior insula (aINS), anterior midcingulate cortex (aMCC), supplementary motor area (SMA), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), somatosensory cortex, and right amygdala. Conversely, during the imagine-other perspective, psychopaths exhibited an atypical pattern of brain activation and effective connectivity seeded in the anterior insula and amygdala with the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). The response in the amygdala and insula was inversely correlated with PCL-R Factor 1 (interpersonal/affective) during the imagine-other perspective. In high psychopaths, scores on PCL-R Factor 1 predicted the neural response in ventral striatum when imagining others in pain. These patterns of brain activation and effective connectivity associated with differential perspective-taking provide a better understanding of empathy dysfunction in psychopathy, and have the potential to inform intervention programs for this complex clinical problem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 604 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 576 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 112 19%
Student > Bachelor 99 16%
Student > Master 96 16%
Researcher 49 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 8%
Other 116 19%
Unknown 83 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 300 50%
Neuroscience 62 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 4%
Social Sciences 15 2%
Other 61 10%
Unknown 103 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#242,528
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#106
of 7,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,557
of 295,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#16
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.