↓ Skip to main content

Task vs. rest—different network configurations between the coactivation and the resting-state brain networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Task vs. rest—different network configurations between the coactivation and the resting-state brain networks
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00493
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Di, Suril Gohel, Eun H. Kim, Bharat B. Biswal

Abstract

There is a growing interest in studies of human brain networks using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, it is unclear whether and how brain networks measured during the resting-state exhibit comparable properties to brain networks during task performance. In the present study, we investigated meta-analytic coactivation patterns among brain regions based upon published neuroimaging studies, and compared the coactivation network configurations with those in the resting-state network. The strength of resting-state functional connectivity between two regions were strongly correlated with the coactivation strength. However, the coactivation network showed greater global efficiency, smaller mean clustering coefficient, and lower modularity compared with the resting-state network, which suggest a more efficient global information transmission and between system integrations during task performing. Hub shifts were also observed within the thalamus and the left inferior temporal cortex. The thalamus and the left inferior temporal cortex exhibited higher and lower degrees, respectively in the coactivation network compared with the resting-state network. These results shed light regarding the reconfiguration of the brain networks between task and resting-state conditions, and highlight the role of the thalamus in change of network configurations in task vs. rest.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 277 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 27%
Researcher 53 18%
Student > Master 39 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 42 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 59 20%
Psychology 52 18%
Engineering 28 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 8%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 71 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2013.
All research outputs
#14,629,021
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,835
of 7,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,414
of 280,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#641
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.