You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why non-invasive brain stimulation should not be used in military and security services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00553 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bernhard Sehm, Patrick Ragert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Serbia | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 79% |
| Scientists | 6 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Professor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Engineering | 7 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2015.
All research outputs
#1,098,338
of 25,243,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#490
of 7,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,083
of 293,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#72
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,243,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.