↓ Skip to main content

Making long-term memories in minutes: a spaced learning pattern from memory research in education

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
104 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
reddit
6 Redditors
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Making long-term memories in minutes: a spaced learning pattern from memory research in education
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00589
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Kelley, Terry Whatson

Abstract

Memory systems select from environmental stimuli those to encode permanently. Repeated stimuli separated by timed spaces without stimuli can initiate Long-Term Potentiation (LTP) and long-term memory (LTM) encoding. These processes occur in time scales of minutes, and have been demonstrated in many species. This study reports on using a specific timed pattern of three repeated stimuli separated by 10 min spaces drawn from both behavioral and laboratory studies of LTP and LTM encoding. A technique was developed based on this pattern to test whether encoding complex information into LTM in students was possible using the pattern within a very short time scale. In an educational context, stimuli were periods of highly compressed instruction, and spaces were created through 10 min distractor activities. Spaced Learning in this form was used as the only means of instruction for a national curriculum Biology course, and led to very rapid LTM encoding as measured by the high-stakes test for the course. Remarkably, learning at a greatly increased speed and in a pattern that included deliberate distraction produced significantly higher scores than random answers (p < 0.00001) and scores were not significantly different for experimental groups (one hour spaced learning) and control groups (four months teaching). Thus learning per hour of instruction, as measured by the test, was significantly higher for the spaced learning groups (p < 0.00001). In a third condition, spaced learning was used to replace the end of course review for one of two examinations. Results showed significantly higher outcomes for the course using spaced learning (p < 0.0005). The implications of these findings and further areas for research are briefly considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 291 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 42 14%
Researcher 36 12%
Other 18 6%
Other 56 19%
Unknown 60 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 13%
Social Sciences 31 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 10%
Computer Science 22 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 6%
Other 89 30%
Unknown 70 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#255,515
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#113
of 7,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,647
of 290,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#17
of 861 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 861 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.