You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity—a review of known mechanisms from animal studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00687 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davide Reato, Asif Rahman, Marom Bikson, Lucas C. Parra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 498 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 113 | 22% |
| Researcher | 93 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 92 | 18% |
| Unknown | 79 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 114 | 22% |
| Psychology | 83 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 10% |
| Engineering | 52 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 8% |
| Unknown | 123 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#14,377,572
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,597
of 7,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,156
of 282,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#615
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.