↓ Skip to main content

The envirome and the connectome: exploring the structural noise in the human brain associated with socioeconomic deprivation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The envirome and the connectome: exploring the structural noise in the human brain associated with socioeconomic deprivation
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00722
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajeev Krishnadas, Jongrae Kim, John McLean, G. David Batty, Jennifer S. McLean, Keith Millar, Chris J. Packard, Jonathan Cavanagh

Abstract

Complex cognitive functions are widely recognized to be the result of a number of brain regions working together as large-scale networks. Recently, complex network analysis has been used to characterize various structural properties of the large-scale network organization of the brain. For example, the human brain has been found to have a modular architecture i.e., regions within the network form communities (modules) with more connections between regions within the community compared to regions outside it. The aim of this study was to examine the modular and overlapping modular architecture of the brain networks using complex network analysis. We also examined the association between neighborhood level deprivation and brain network structure-modularity and gray nodes. We compared network structure derived from anatomical MRI scans of 42 middle-aged neurologically healthy men from the least (LD) and the most deprived (MD) neighborhoods of Glasgow with their corresponding random networks. Cortical morphological covariance networks were constructed from the cortical thickness derived from the MRI scans of the brain. For a given modularity threshold, networks derived from the MD group showed similar number of modules compared to their corresponding random networks, while networks derived from the LD group had more modules compared to their corresponding random networks. The MD group also had fewer gray nodes-a measure of overlapping modular structure. These results suggest that apparent structural difference in brain networks may be driven by differences in cortical thicknesses between groups. This demonstrates a structural organization that is consistent with a system that is less robust and less efficient in information processing. These findings provide some evidence of the relationship between socioeconomic deprivation and brain network topology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Australia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 64 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 20 29%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#1,232,948
of 24,833,004 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#563
of 7,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,658
of 292,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#92
of 861 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 861 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.