You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The balanced mind: the variability of task-unrelated thoughts predicts error monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00743 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Micah Allen, Jonathan Smallwood, Joanna Christensen, Daniel Gramm, Beinta Rasmussen, Christian Gaden Jensen, Andreas Roepstorff, Antoine Lutz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 17% |
| Canada | 4 | 8% |
| Denmark | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 72% |
| Scientists | 13 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 23% |
| Researcher | 42 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 100 | 48% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#959,431
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#420
of 7,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,458
of 291,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#56
of 861 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 861 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.