↓ Skip to main content

The state of the art in organizational cognitive neuroscience: the therapeutic gap and possible implications for clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The state of the art in organizational cognitive neuroscience: the therapeutic gap and possible implications for clinical practice
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl Senior, Nick Lee

Abstract

In the last decade, researchers in the social sciences have increasingly adopted neuroscientific techniques, with the consequent rise of research inspired by neuroscience in disciplines such as economics, marketing, decision sciences, and leadership. In 2007, we introduced the term organizational cognitive neuroscience (OCN), in an attempt to clearly demarcate research carried out in these many areas, and provide an overarching paradigm for research utilizing cognitive neuroscientific methods, theories, and concepts, within the organizational and business research fields. Here we will revisit and further refine the OCN paradigm, and define an approach where we feel the marriage of organizational theory and neuroscience will return even greater dividends in the future and that is within the field of clinical practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 27 23%
Psychology 23 20%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 29 25%