↓ Skip to main content

Prefrontal cortex and executive function in young children: a review of NIRS studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
389 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prefrontal cortex and executive function in young children: a review of NIRS studies
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00867
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yusuke Moriguchi, Kazuo Hiraki

Abstract

Executive function (EF) refers to the higher-order cognitive control process for the attainment of a specific goal. There are several subcomponents of EF, such as inhibition, cognitive shifting, and working memory. Extensive neuroimaging research in adults has revealed that the lateral prefrontal cortex plays an important role in EF. Developmental studies have reported behavioral evidence showing that EF changes significantly during preschool years. However, the neural mechanism of EF in young children is still unclear. This article reviews recent near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) research that examined the relationship between the development of EF and the lateral prefrontal cortex. Specifically, this review focuses on inhibitory control, cognitive shifting, and working memory in young children. Research has consistently shown significant prefrontal activation during tasks in typically developed children, but this activation may be abnormal in children with developmental disorders. Finally, methodological issues and future directions are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 375 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 19%
Student > Master 55 14%
Researcher 46 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 69 18%
Unknown 80 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 143 37%
Neuroscience 42 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 5%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 103 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,356,859
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,912
of 7,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,247
of 290,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#276
of 861 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 861 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.