↓ Skip to main content

On the interpretation of synchronization in EEG hyperscanning studies: a cautionary note

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the interpretation of synchronization in EEG hyperscanning studies: a cautionary note
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00881
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian P. Burgess

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 346 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 21%
Student > Master 55 15%
Researcher 53 15%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 68 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 105 29%
Neuroscience 66 18%
Engineering 29 8%
Computer Science 18 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 87 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,168,453
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#987
of 7,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,120
of 295,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#159
of 862 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 862 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.