↓ Skip to main content

Frontopolar cortex and decision-making efficiency: comparing brain activity of experts with different professional background during an exploration-exploitation task

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frontopolar cortex and decision-making efficiency: comparing brain activity of experts with different professional background during an exploration-exploitation task
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00927
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniella Laureiro-Martínez, Nicola Canessa, Stefano Brusoni, Maurizio Zollo, Todd Hare, Federica Alemanno, Stefano F. Cappa

Abstract

An optimal balance between efficient exploitation of available resources and creative exploration of alternatives is critical for adaptation and survival. Previous studies associated these behavioral drives with, respectively, the dopaminergic mesocorticolimbic system and frontopolar-intraparietal networks. We study the activation of these systems in two age and gender-matched groups of experienced decision-makers differing in prior professional background, with the aim to understand the neural bases of individual differences in decision-making efficiency (performance divided by response time). We compare brain activity of entrepreneurs (who currently manage the organization they founded based on their venture idea) and managers (who are constantly involved in making strategic decisions but have no venture experience) engaged in a gambling-task assessing exploitative vs. explorative decision-making. Compared with managers, entrepreneurs showed higher decision-making efficiency, and a stronger activation in regions of frontopolar cortex (FPC) previously associated with explorative choice. Moreover, activity across a network of regions previously linked to explore/exploit tradeoffs explained individual differences in choice efficiency. These results suggest new avenues for the study of individual differences in the neural antecedents of efficient decision-making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 179 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 20%
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 37 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 27 14%
Neuroscience 24 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 5%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 46 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#230,946
of 23,659,844 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#112
of 7,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,224
of 309,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#8
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,659,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.