↓ Skip to main content

Mental workload during n-back task—quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
280 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mental workload during n-back task—quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00935
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Herff, Dominic Heger, Ole Fortmann, Johannes Hennrich, Felix Putze, Tanja Schultz

Abstract

When interacting with technical systems, users experience mental workload. Particularly in multitasking scenarios (e.g., interacting with the car navigation system while driving) it is desired to not distract the users from their primary task. For such purposes, human-machine interfaces (HCIs) are desirable which continuously monitor the users' workload and dynamically adapt the behavior of the interface to the measured workload. While memory tasks have been shown to elicit hemodynamic responses in the brain when averaging over multiple trials, a robust single trial classification is a crucial prerequisite for the purpose of dynamically adapting HCIs to the workload of its user. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays an important role in the processing of memory and the associated workload. In this study of 10 subjects, we used functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS), a non-invasive imaging modality, to sample workload activity in the PFC. The results show up to 78% accuracy for single-trial discrimination of three levels of workload from each other. We use an n-back task (n ∈ {1, 2, 3}) to induce different levels of workload, forcing subjects to continuously remember the last one, two, or three of rapidly changing items. Our experimental results show that measuring hemodynamic responses in the PFC with fNIRS, can be used to robustly quantify and classify mental workload. Single trial analysis is still a young field that suffers from a general lack of standards. To increase comparability of fNIRS methods and results, the data corpus for this study is made available online.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 400 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 24%
Student > Master 65 16%
Researcher 53 13%
Student > Bachelor 41 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 54 13%
Unknown 77 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 82 20%
Psychology 71 17%
Neuroscience 51 12%
Computer Science 34 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 5%
Other 61 15%
Unknown 92 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,770,397
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,903
of 7,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,023
of 305,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#84
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.