↓ Skip to main content

Chronic traumatic encephalopathy and other neurodegenerative proteinopathies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy and other neurodegenerative proteinopathies
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Carmela Tartaglia, Lili-Naz Hazrati, Karen D. Davis, Robin E. A. Green, Richard Wennberg, David Mikulis, Leo J. Ezerins, Michelle Keightley, Charles Tator

Abstract

"Chronic traumatic encephalopathy" (CTE) is described as a slowly progressive neurodegenerative disease believed to result from multiple concussions. Traditionally, concussions were considered benign events and although most people recover fully, about 10% develop a post-concussive syndrome with persisting neurological, cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms. CTE was once thought to be unique to boxers, but it has now been observed in many different athletes having suffered multiple concussions as well as in military personal after repeated blast injuries. Much remains unknown about the development of CTE but its pathological substrate is usually tau, similar to that seen in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). The aim of this "perspective" is to compare and contrast clinical and pathological CTE with the other neurodegenerative proteinopathies and highlight that there is an urgent need for understanding the relationship between concussion and the development of CTE as it may provide a window into the development of a proteinopathy and thus new avenues for treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 192 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 13%
Student > Master 22 11%
Researcher 20 10%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 26%
Neuroscience 28 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 11%
Psychology 14 7%
Sports and Recreations 10 5%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 40 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,234,178
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,590
of 7,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,764
of 305,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#54
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.