↓ Skip to main content

Reorganization and plastic changes of the human brain associated with skill learning and expertise

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reorganization and plastic changes of the human brain associated with skill learning and expertise
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongmin Chang

Abstract

Novel experience and learning new skills are known as modulators of brain function. Advances in non-invasive brain imaging have provided new insight into structural and functional reorganization associated with skill learning and expertise. Especially, significant imaging evidences come from the domains of sports and music. Data from in vivo imaging studies in sports and music have provided vital information on plausible neural substrates contributing to brain reorganization underlying skill acquisition in humans. This mini review will attempt to take a narrow snapshot of imaging findings demonstrating functional and structural plasticity that mediate skill learning and expertise while identifying converging areas of interest and possible avenues for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 291 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 16%
Student > Master 47 16%
Researcher 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 69 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 19%
Neuroscience 50 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Other 57 19%
Unknown 86 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 179. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#212,840
of 24,579,850 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#94
of 7,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,949
of 316,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.