↓ Skip to main content

Voluntary Out-of-Body Experience: An fMRI Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 7,767)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Voluntary Out-of-Body Experience: An fMRI Study
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andra M. Smith, Claude Messier

Abstract

The present single-case study examined functional brain imaging patterns in a participant that reported being able, at will, to produce somatosensory sensations that are experienced as her body moving outside the boundaries of her physical body all the while remaining aware of her unmoving physical body. We found that the brain functional changes associated with the reported extra-corporeal experience (ECE) were different than those observed in motor imagery. Activations were mainly left-sided and involved the left supplementary motor area and supramarginal and posterior superior temporal gyri, the last two overlapping with the temporal parietal junction that has been associated with out-of-body experiences. The cerebellum also showed activation that is consistent with the participant's report of the impression of movement during the ECE. There was also left middle and superior orbital frontal gyri activity, regions often associated with action monitoring. The results suggest that the ECE reported here represents an unusual type of kinesthetic imagery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 155 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 42 25%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 29%
Neuroscience 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Engineering 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 35 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 348. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#95,484
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#49
of 7,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#776
of 321,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.