↓ Skip to main content

It's how you get there: walking down a virtual alley activates premotor and parietal areas

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
It's how you get there: walking down a virtual alley activates premotor and parietal areas
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00093
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna Wagner, Teodoro Solis-Escalante, Reinhold Scherer, Christa Neuper, Gernot Müller-Putz

Abstract

Voluntary drive is crucial for motor learning, therefore we are interested in the role that motor planning plays in gait movements. In this study we examined the impact of an interactive Virtual Environment (VE) feedback task on the EEG patterns during robot assisted walking. We compared walking in the VE modality to two control conditions: walking with a visual attention paradigm, in which visual stimuli were unrelated to the motor task; and walking with mirror feedback, in which participants observed their own movements. Eleven healthy participants were considered. Application of independent component analysis to the EEG revealed three independent component clusters in premotor and parietal areas showing increased activity during walking with the adaptive VE training paradigm compared to the control conditions. During the interactive VE walking task spectral power in frequency ranges 8-12, 15-20, and 23-40 Hz was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) decreased. This power decrease is interpreted as a correlate of an active cortical area. Furthermore activity in the premotor cortex revealed gait cycle related modulations significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) from baseline in the frequency range 23-40 Hz during walking. These modulations were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced depending on gait cycle phases in the interactive VE walking task compared to the control conditions. We demonstrate that premotor and parietal areas show increased activity during walking with the adaptive VE training paradigm, when compared to walking with mirror- and movement unrelated feedback. Previous research has related a premotor-parietal network to motor planning and motor intention. We argue that movement related interactive feedback enhances motor planning and motor intention. We hypothesize that this might improve gait recovery during rehabilitation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 199 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 24%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 32 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 36 17%
Engineering 31 15%
Psychology 29 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Computer Science 14 7%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 47 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,224,618
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,528
of 7,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,760
of 305,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#120
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.