You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impaired extraction of speech rhythm from temporal modulation patterns in speech in developmental dyslexia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00096 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria Leong, Usha Goswami |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 18% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 41 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,345,186
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,283
of 7,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,360
of 324,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#83
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.