↓ Skip to main content

Antagonistic neural networks underlying differentiated leadership roles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
64 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antagonistic neural networks underlying differentiated leadership roles
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard E. Boyatzis, Kylie Rochford, Anthony I. Jack

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 223 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 16%
Student > Master 37 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 11%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 48 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 40 17%
Social Sciences 21 9%
Neuroscience 14 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Other 46 20%
Unknown 55 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#289,745
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#133
of 7,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,337
of 236,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.