↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic network participation of functional connectivity hubs assessed by resting-state fMRI

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic network participation of functional connectivity hubs assessed by resting-state fMRI
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00195
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Schaefer, Daniel S. Margulies, Gabriele Lohmann, Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski, Jonathan Smallwood, Stefan J. Kiebel, Arno Villringer

Abstract

Network studies of large-scale brain connectivity have demonstrated that highly connected areas, or "hubs," are a key feature of human functional and structural brain organization. We use resting-state functional MRI data and connectivity clustering to identify multi-network hubs and show that while hubs can belong to multiple networks their degree of integration into these different networks varies dynamically over time. The extent of the network variation was related to the connectedness of the hub. In addition, we found that these network dynamics were inversely related to positive self-generated thoughts reported by individuals and were further decreased with older age. Moreover, the left caudate varied its degree of participation between a default mode subnetwork and a limbic network. This variation was predictive of individual differences in the reports of past-related thoughts. These results support an association between ongoing thought processes and network dynamics and offer a new approach to investigate the brain dynamics underlying mental experience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 183 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 28%
Researcher 44 23%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 14 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 25%
Neuroscience 41 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 15%
Engineering 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 28 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2014.
All research outputs
#5,852,981
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,263
of 7,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,470
of 231,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#108
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.