You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pupillary behavior in relation to wavelength and age
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00221 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis-Lucio Lobato-Rincón, Maria del Carmen Cabanillas-Campos, Cristina Bonnin-Arias, Eva Chamorro-Gutiérrez, Antonio Murciano-Cespedosa, Celia Sánchez-Ramos Roda |
| Abstract |
Pupil light reflex can be used as a non-invasive ocular predictor of cephalic autonomic nervous system integrity. Spectral sensitivity of the pupil's response to light has, for some time, been an interesting issue. It has generally, however, only been investigated with the use of white light and studies with monochromatic wavelengths are scarce. This study investigates the effects of wavelength and age within three parameters of the pupil light reflex (amplitude of response, latency, and velocity of constriction) in a large sample of younger and older adults (N = 97), in mesopic conditions. Subjects were exposed to a single light stimulus at four different wavelengths: white (5600°K), blue (450 nm), green (510 nm), and red (600 nm). Data was analyzed appropriately, and, when applicable, using the General Linear Model (GLM), Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), Student's t-test and/or ANCOVA. Across all subjects, pupillary response to light had the greatest amplitude and shortest latency in white and green light conditions. In regards to age, older subjects (46-78 years) showed an increased latency in white light and decreased velocity of constriction in green light compared to younger subjects (18-45 years old). This study provides data patterns on parameters of wavelength-dependent pupil reflexes to light in adults and it contributes to the large body of pupillometric research. It is hoped that this study will add to the overall evaluation of cephalic autonomic nervous system integrity. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 13% |
| Psychology | 12 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 8% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,459,003
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,240
of 7,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,134
of 227,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#63
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.