You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the relationship of online and offline social cognition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00278 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonhard Schilbach |
| Abstract |
Social neuroscience studies the neurobiological underpinnings of people making sense of people. Due to both conceptual and methodological constraints, the majority of studies in this field of research, however, has employed experimental paradigms that focus on social cognition from an observer's rather than from an interactor's point of view (offline vs. online social cognition). This calls for an increased effort to systematically investigate the neural bases of participation in real-time social interaction. In light of the ontogenetic primacy of social interaction over observation and the idea that neural networks established during social interaction may be "re-used" during observation, other important objectives of the field will be to relate new findings into the neural bases of social interaction to previous work investigating the neural bases of social observation as well as to find ways to directly compare the two. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| Germany | 5 | 9% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Denmark | 3 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 59% |
| Scientists | 20 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 20% |
| Researcher | 31 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 55 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,182,374
of 24,639,073 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#533
of 7,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,638
of 232,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#33
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,639,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.