↓ Skip to main content

From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valérian Chambon, Nura Sidarus, Patrick Haggard

Abstract

Sense of agency refers to the feeling of controlling an external event through one's own action. On one influential view, agency depends on how predictable the consequences of one's action are, getting stronger as the match between predicted and actual effect of an action gets closer. Thus, sense of agency arises when external events that follow our action are consistent with predictions of action effects made by the motor system while we perform or simply intend to perform an action. According to this view, agency is inferred retrospectively, after an action has been performed and its consequences are known. In contrast, little is known about whether and how internal processes involved in the selection of actions may influence subjective sense of control, in advance of the action itself, and irrespective of effect predictability. In this article, we review several classes of behavioral and neuroimaging data suggesting that earlier processes, linked to fluency of action selection, prospectively contribute to sense of agency. These findings have important implications for better understanding human volition and abnormalities of action experience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 316 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 20%
Researcher 48 14%
Student > Master 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Professor 31 9%
Other 60 18%
Unknown 44 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 139 42%
Neuroscience 44 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Philosophy 13 4%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 57 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,716,904
of 24,626,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#814
of 7,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,040
of 231,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#43
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,626,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.