↓ Skip to main content

The neural correlates of regulating another person's emotions: an exploratory fMRI study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The neural correlates of regulating another person's emotions: an exploratory fMRI study
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00376
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glyn P. Hallam, Thomas L. Webb, Paschal Sheeran, Eleanor Miles, Karen Niven, Iain D. Wilkinson, Michael D. Hunter, Peter W. R. Woodruff, Peter Totterdell, Tom F. D. Farrow

Abstract

Studies investigating the neurophysiological basis of intrapersonal emotion regulation (control of one's own emotional experience) report that the frontal cortex exerts a modulatory effect on limbic structures such as the amygdala and insula. However, no imaging study to date has examined the neurophysiological processes involved in interpersonal emotion regulation, where the goal is explicitly to regulate another person's emotion. Twenty healthy participants (10 males) underwent fMRI while regulating their own or another person's emotions. Intrapersonal and interpersonal emotion regulation tasks recruited an overlapping network of brain regions including bilateral lateral frontal cortex, pre-supplementary motor area, and left temporo-parietal junction. Activations unique to the interpersonal condition suggest that both affective (emotional simulation) and cognitive (mentalizing) aspects of empathy may be involved in the process of interpersonal emotion regulation. These findings provide an initial insight into the neural correlates of regulating another person's emotions and may be relevant to understanding mental health issues that involve problems with social interaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 144 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 21%
Student > Master 25 17%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 79 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 30 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,685,471
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#820
of 7,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,232
of 307,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#29
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.