↓ Skip to main content

Brain plasticity-based therapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
37 X users
facebook
15 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain plasticity-based therapeutics
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael M. Merzenich, Thomas M. Van Vleet, Mor Nahum

Abstract

The primary objective of this review article is to summarize how the neuroscience of brain plasticity, exploiting new findings in fundamental, integrative and cognitive neuroscience, is changing the therapeutic landscape for professional communities addressing brain-based disorders and disease. After considering the neurological bases of training-driven neuroplasticity, we shall describe how this neuroscience-guided perspective distinguishes this new approach from (a) the more-behavioral, traditional clinical strategies of professional therapy practitioners, and (b) an even more widely applied pharmaceutical treatment model for neurological and psychiatric treatment domains. With that background, we shall argue that neuroplasticity-based treatments will be an important part of future best-treatment practices in neurological and psychiatric medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 355 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 18%
Researcher 53 15%
Student > Master 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Other 23 6%
Other 76 21%
Unknown 60 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 18%
Neuroscience 61 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 4%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 79 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#438,578
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#199
of 7,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,300
of 227,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.