↓ Skip to main content

Rhythm perception and production predict reading abilities in developmental dyslexia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rhythm perception and production predict reading abilities in developmental dyslexia
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00392
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Flaugnacco, Luisa Lopez, Chiara Terribili, Stefania Zoia, Sonia Buda, Sara Tilli, Lorenzo Monasta, Marcella Montico, Alessandra Sila, Luca Ronfani, Daniele Schön

Abstract

Rhythm organizes events in time and plays a major role in music, but also in the phonology and prosody of a language. Interestingly, children with developmental dyslexia-a learning disability that affects reading acquisition despite normal intelligence and adequate education-have a poor rhythmic perception. It has been suggested that an accurate perception of rhythmical/metrical structure, that requires accurate perception of rise time, may be critical for phonological development and subsequent literacy. This hypothesis is mostly based on results showing a high degree of correlation between phonological awareness and metrical skills, using a very specific metrical task. We present new findings from the analysis of a sample of 48 children with a diagnosis of dyslexia, without comorbidities. These children were assessed with neuropsychological tests, as well as specifically-devised psychoacoustic and musical tasks mostly testing temporal abilities. Associations were tested by multivariate analyses including data mining strategies, correlations and most importantly logistic regressions to understand to what extent the different auditory and musical skills can be a robust predictor of reading and phonological skills. Results show a strong link between several temporal skills and phonological and reading abilities. These findings are discussed in the framework of the neuroscience literature comparing music and language processing, with a particular interest in the links between rhythm processing in music and language.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 340 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 17%
Researcher 53 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 64 18%
Unknown 65 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 109 31%
Neuroscience 35 10%
Social Sciences 25 7%
Arts and Humanities 23 7%
Linguistics 22 6%
Other 56 16%
Unknown 79 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,585,816
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,195
of 7,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,971
of 245,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#61
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.