You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rubber hand illusion induced by touching the face ipsilaterally to a deprived hand: evidence for plastic “somatotopic” remapping in tetraplegics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00404 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michele Scandola, Emmanuele Tidoni, Renato Avesani, Giovanni Brunelli, Salvatore M. Aglioti, Valentina Moro |
Abstract |
Studies in animals and humans indicate that the interruption of body-brain connections following spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to plastic cerebral reorganization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 3 | 43% |
Australia | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
Researcher | 17 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 25 | 26% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
Engineering | 7 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,698,587
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,349
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,587
of 229,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#112
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.