↓ Skip to main content

What does scalar timing tell us about neural dynamics?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What does scalar timing tell us about neural dynamics?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00438
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harel Z. Shouval, Marshall G. Hussain Shuler, Animesh Agarwal, Jeffrey P. Gavornik

Abstract

The "Scalar Timing Law," which is a temporal domain generalization of the well known Weber Law, states that the errors estimating temporal intervals scale linearly with the durations of the intervals. Linear scaling has been studied extensively in human and animal models and holds over several orders of magnitude, though to date there is no agreed upon explanation for its physiological basis. Starting from the assumption that behavioral variability stems from neural variability, this work shows how to derive firing rate functions that are consistent with scalar timing. We show that firing rate functions with a log-power form, and a set of parameters that depend on spike count statistics, can account for scalar timing. Our derivation depends on a linear approximation, but we use simulations to validate the theory and show that log-power firing rate functions result in scalar timing over a large range of times and parameters. Simulation results match the predictions of our model, though our initial formulation results in a slight bias toward overestimation that can be corrected using a simple iterative approach to learn a decision threshold.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Argentina 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 31 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 36%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 22%
Psychology 8 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Physics and Astronomy 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#22,420,092
of 25,010,497 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,886
of 7,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,123
of 234,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#245
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,010,497 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.