↓ Skip to main content

“I am resting but rest less well with you.” The moderating effect of anxious attachment style on alpha power during EEG resting state in a social context

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“I am resting but rest less well with you.” The moderating effect of anxious attachment style on alpha power during EEG resting state in a social context
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00486
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willem J. M. I. Verbeke, Rumen Pozharliev, Jan W. Van Strien, Frank Belschak, Richard P. Bagozzi

Abstract

We took EEG recordings to measure task-free resting-state cortical brain activity in 35 participants under two conditions, alone (A) or together (T). We also investigated whether psychological attachment styles shape human cortical activity differently in these two settings. The results indicate that social context matters and that participants' cortical activity is moderated by the anxious, but not avoidant attachment style. We found enhanced alpha, beta and theta band activity in the T rather than the A resting-state condition, which was more pronounced in posterior brain regions. We further found a positive correlation between anxious attachment style and enhanced alpha power in the T vs. A condition over frontal and parietal scalp regions. There was no significant correlation between the absolute powers registered in the other two frequency bands and the participants' anxious attachment style.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Professor 4 6%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 36%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2014.
All research outputs
#3,642,771
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,729
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,301
of 226,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#91
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.