↓ Skip to main content

Social and emotional relevance in face processing: happy faces of future interaction partners enhance the late positive potential

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social and emotional relevance in face processing: happy faces of future interaction partners enhance the late positive potential
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00493
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Bublatzky, Antje B. M. Gerdes, Andrew J. White, Martin Riemer, Georg W. Alpers

Abstract

Human face perception is modulated by both emotional valence and social relevance, but their interaction has rarely been examined. Event-related brain potentials (ERP) to happy, neutral, and angry facial expressions with different degrees of social relevance were recorded. To implement a social anticipation task, relevance was manipulated by presenting faces of two specific actors as future interaction partners (socially relevant), whereas two other face actors remained non-relevant. In a further control task all stimuli were presented without specific relevance instructions (passive viewing). Face stimuli of four actors (2 women, from the KDEF) were randomly presented for 1s to 26 participants (16 female). Results showed an augmented N170, early posterior negativity (EPN), and late positive potential (LPP) for emotional in contrast to neutral facial expressions. Of particular interest, face processing varied as a function of experimental tasks. Whereas task effects were observed for P1 and EPN regardless of instructed relevance, LPP amplitudes were modulated by emotional facial expression and relevance manipulation. The LPP was specifically enhanced for happy facial expressions of the anticipated future interaction partners. This underscores that social relevance can impact face processing already at an early stage of visual processing. These findings are discussed within the framework of motivated attention and face processing theories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 121 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 30%
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 51%
Neuroscience 16 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 30 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2014.
All research outputs
#12,839,883
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,601
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,797
of 226,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#143
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.