↓ Skip to main content

The neurobiology of methamphetamine induced psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The neurobiology of methamphetamine induced psychosis
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00537
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer H. Hsieh, Dan J. Stein, Fleur M. Howells

Abstract

Chronic methamphetamine abuse commonly leads to psychosis, with positive and cognitive symptoms that are similar to those of schizophrenia. Methamphetamine induced psychosis (MAP) can persist and diagnoses of MAP often change to a diagnosis of schizophrenia over time. Studies in schizophrenia have found much evidence of cortical GABAergic dysfunction. Methamphetamine psychosis is a well studied model for schizophrenia, however there is little research on the effects of methamphetamine on cortical GABAergic function in the model, and the neurobiology of MAP is unknown. This paper reviews the effects of methamphetamine on dopaminergic pathways, with focus on its ability to increase glutamate release in the cortex. Excess cortical glutamate would likely damage GABAergic interneurons, and evidence of this disturbance as a result of methamphetamine treatment will be discussed. We propose that cortical GABAergic interneurons are particularly vulnerable to glutamate overflow as a result of subcellular location of NMDA receptors on interneurons in the cortex. Damage to cortical GABAergic function would lead to dysregulation of cortical signals, resulting in psychosis, and further support MAP as a model for schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 1%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 211 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Other 19 9%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 54 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 20%
Neuroscience 26 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 9%
Psychology 17 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 64 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,569,045
of 25,249,294 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,208
of 7,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,869
of 235,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#56
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,249,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.