↓ Skip to main content

Eluding the illusion? Schizophrenia, dopamine and the McGurk effect

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eluding the illusion? Schizophrenia, dopamine and the McGurk effect
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00565
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas P. White, Rebekah L. Wigton, Dan W. Joyce, Tracy Bobin, Christian Ferragamo, Nisha Wasim, Stephen Lisk, Sukhwinder S. Shergill

Abstract

Perceptions are inherently probabilistic; and can be potentially manipulated to induce illusory experience by the presentation of ambiguous or improbable evidence under selective (spatio-temporal) constraints. Accordingly, perception of the McGurk effect, by which individuals misperceive specific incongruent visual and auditory vocal cues, rests upon effective probabilistic inference. Here, we report findings from a behavioral investigation of illusory perception and related metacognitive evaluation during audiovisual integration, conducted in individuals with schizophrenia (n = 30) and control subjects (n = 24) matched in terms of age, sex, handedness and parental occupation. Controls additionally performed the task after an oral dose of amisulpride (400 mg). Individuals with schizophrenia were observed to exhibit illusory perception less frequently than controls, despite non-significant differences in perceptual performance during control conditions. Furthermore, older individuals with schizophrenia exhibited reduced rates of illusory perception. Subsequent analysis revealed a robust inverse relationship between illness chronicity and the illusory perception rate in this group. Controls demonstrated non-significant modulation of perception by amisulpride; amisulpride was, however, found to elicit increases in subjective confidence in perceptual performance. Overall, these findings are consistent with the idea that impairments in probabilistic inference are exhibited in schizophrenia and exacerbated by illness chronicity. The latter suggests that associated processes are a potentially worthwhile target for therapeutic intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Turkey 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 96 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Master 13 13%
Professor 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 36%
Neuroscience 24 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Computer Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,819,234
of 23,322,258 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,149
of 7,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,781
of 231,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#215
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.