You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Emotional attentional capture in children with conduct problems: the role of callous-unemotional traits
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00570 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sara Hodsoll, Nilli Lavie, Essi Viding |
Abstract |
Appropriate reactivity to emotional facial expressions, even if these are seen whilst we are engaged in another activity, is critical for successful social interaction. Children with conduct problems (CP) and high levels of callous-unemotional (CU) traits are characterized by blunted reactivity to other people's emotions, while children with CP and low levels of CU traits can over-react to perceived emotional threat. No study to date has compared children with CP and high vs. low levels of CU traits to typically developing (TD) children or each other, using a task that assesses attentional capture by irrelevant emotional faces. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
Portugal | 1 | 8% |
Japan | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 104 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 18% |
Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Researcher | 7 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 16% |
Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 65 | 61% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 24 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,645,063
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,731
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,822
of 236,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#86
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.