You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional MRI activation in white matter during the Symbol Digit Modalities Test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00589 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jodie R. Gawryluk, Erin L. Mazerolle, Steven D. Beyea, Ryan C. N. D'Arcy |
| Abstract |
Recent evidence shows that functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can detect activation in white matter (WM). Such advances have important implications for understanding WM dysfunction. A key step in linking neuroimaging advances to the evaluation of clinical disorders is to examine whether WM activation can be detected at the individual level during clinical tests associated with WM function. We used an adapted Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) in a 4T fMRI study of healthy adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Librarian | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 21% |
| Engineering | 8 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#12,840,433
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,602
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,054
of 229,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#140
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.