↓ Skip to main content

Cortical information flow during inferences of agency

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cortical information flow during inferences of agency
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00609
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myrthel Dogge, Dennis Hofman, Maria Boersma, H. Chris Dijkerman, Henk Aarts

Abstract

Building on the recent finding that agency experiences do not merely rely on sensorimotor information but also on cognitive cues, this exploratory study uses electroencephalographic recordings to examine functional connectivity during agency inference processing in a setting where action and outcome are independent. Participants completed a computerized task in which they pressed a button followed by one of two color words (red or blue) and rated their experienced agency over producing the color. Before executing the action, a matching or mismatching color word was pre-activated by explicitly instructing participants to produce the color (goal condition) or by briefly presenting the color word (prime condition). In both conditions, experienced agency was higher in matching vs. mismatching trials. Furthermore, increased electroencephalography (EEG)-based connectivity strength was observed between parietal and frontal nodes and within the (pre)frontal cortex when color-outcomes matched with goals and participants reported high agency. This pattern of increased connectivity was not identified in trials where outcomes were pre-activated through primes. These results suggest that different connections are involved in the experience and in the loss of agency, as well as in inferences of agency resulting from different types of pre-activation. Moreover, the findings provide novel support for the involvement of a fronto-parietal network in agency inferences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 34%
Neuroscience 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,235,415
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,530
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,346
of 231,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#227
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.