↓ Skip to main content

Bodily synchronization underlying joke telling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
39 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bodily synchronization underlying joke telling
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00633
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. C. Schmidt, Lin Nie, Alison Franco, Michael J. Richardson

Abstract

Advances in video and time series analysis have greatly enhanced our ability to study the bodily synchronization that occurs in natural interactions. Past research has demonstrated that the behavioral synchronization involved in social interactions is similar to dynamical synchronization found generically in nature. The present study investigated how the bodily synchronization in a joke telling task is spread across different nested temporal scales. Pairs of participants enacted knock-knock jokes and times series of their bodily activity were recorded. Coherence and relative phase analyses were used to evaluate the synchronization of bodily rhythms for the whole trial as well as at the subsidiary time scales of the whole joke, the setup of the punch line, the two-person exchange and the utterance. The analyses revealed greater than chance entrainment of the joke teller's and joke responder's movements at all time scales and that the relative phasing of the teller's movements led those of the responder at the longer time scales. Moreover, this entrainment was greater when visual information about the partner's movements was present but was decreased particularly at the shorter time scales when explicit gesturing in telling the joke was performed. In short, the results demonstrate that a complex interpersonal bodily "dance" occurs during structured conversation interactions and that this "dance" is constructed from a set of rhythms associated with the nested behavioral structure of the interaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 126 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 22%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Master 12 9%
Professor 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 41%
Neuroscience 11 8%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Computer Science 5 4%
Linguistics 4 3%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 31 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2015.
All research outputs
#900,020
of 24,475,473 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#410
of 7,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,932
of 235,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#19
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,475,473 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.