↓ Skip to main content

The experience of agency in human-computer interactions: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The experience of agency in human-computer interactions: a review
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Limerick, David Coyle, James W. Moore

Abstract

The sense of agency is the experience of controlling both one's body and the external environment. Although the sense of agency has been studied extensively, there is a paucity of studies in applied "real-life" situations. One applied domain that seems highly relevant is human-computer-interaction (HCI), as an increasing number of our everyday agentive interactions involve technology. Indeed, HCI has long recognized the feeling of control as a key factor in how people experience interactions with technology. The aim of this review is to summarize and examine the possible links between sense of agency and understanding control in HCI. We explore the overlap between HCI and sense of agency for computer input modalities and system feedback, computer assistance, and joint actions between humans and computers. An overarching consideration is how agency research can inform HCI and vice versa. Finally, we discuss the potential ethical implications of personal responsibility in an ever-increasing society of technology users and intelligent machine interfaces.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 311 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 23%
Student > Master 47 15%
Researcher 43 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 5%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 71 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 22%
Computer Science 53 17%
Engineering 27 8%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Neuroscience 15 5%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 85 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,877,314
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,800
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,503
of 235,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#84
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.