↓ Skip to main content

Reference frames in virtual spatial navigation are viewpoint dependent

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reference frames in virtual spatial navigation are viewpoint dependent
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00646
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ágoston Török, T. Peter Nguyen, Orsolya Kolozsvári, Robert J. Buchanan, Zoltan Nadasdy

Abstract

Spatial navigation in the mammalian brain relies on a cognitive map of the environment. Such cognitive maps enable us, for example, to take the optimal route from a given location to a known target. The formation of these maps is naturally influenced by our perception of the environment, meaning it is dependent on factors such as our viewpoint and choice of reference frame. Yet, it is unknown how these factors influence the construction of cognitive maps. Here, we evaluated how various combinations of viewpoints and reference frames affect subjects' performance when they navigated in a bounded virtual environment without landmarks. We measured both their path length and time efficiency and found that (1) ground perspective was associated with egocentric frame of reference, (2) aerial perspective was associated with allocentric frame of reference, (3) there was no appreciable performance difference between first and third person egocentric viewing positions and (4) while none of these effects were dependent on gender, males tended to perform better in general. Our study provides evidence that there are inherent associations between visual perspectives and cognitive reference frames. This result has implications about the mechanisms of path integration in the human brain and may also inspire designs of virtual reality applications. Lastly, we demonstrated the effective use of a tablet PC and spatial navigation tasks for studying spatial and cognitive aspects of human memory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 20%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 33%
Neuroscience 15 14%
Computer Science 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,381,794
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6,058
of 7,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,219
of 238,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#219
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.