You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00650 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gina Rippon, Rebecca Jordan-Young, Anelis Kaiser, Cordelia Fine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 13% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 85% |
| Scientists | 8 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 253 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 18% |
| Unknown | 52 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 63 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 39 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 18% |
| Unknown | 67 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 221. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#178,047
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#82
of 7,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,418
of 248,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.