↓ Skip to main content

A review of structural neuroimaging in schizophrenia: from connectivity to connectomics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of structural neuroimaging in schizophrenia: from connectivity to connectomics
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne L. Wheeler, Aristotle N. Voineskos

Abstract

In patients with schizophrenia neuroimaging studies have revealed global differences with some brain regions showing focal abnormalities. Examining neurocircuitry, diffusion-weighted imaging studies have identified altered structural integrity of white matter in frontal and temporal brain regions and tracts such as the cingulum bundles, uncinate fasciculi, internal capsules and corpus callosum associated with the illness. Furthermore, structural co-variance analyses have revealed altered structural relationships among regional morphology in the thalamus, frontal, temporal and parietal cortices in schizophrenia patients. The distributed nature of these abnormalities in schizophrenia suggests that multiple brain circuits are impaired, a neural feature that may be better addressed with network level analyses. However, even with the advent of these newer analyses, a large amount of variability in findings remains, likely partially due to the considerable heterogeneity present in this disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 360 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 22%
Researcher 60 16%
Student > Master 59 16%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 64 17%
Unknown 50 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 90 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 16%
Psychology 54 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 9%
Engineering 15 4%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 81 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,317,294
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#604
of 7,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,542
of 240,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#28
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.