↓ Skip to main content

Electrophysiological evidence for functionally distinct neuronal populations in the human substantia nigra

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrophysiological evidence for functionally distinct neuronal populations in the human substantia nigra
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashwin G. Ramayya, Kareem A. Zaghloul, Christoph T. Weidemann, Gordon H. Baltuch, Michael J. Kahana

Abstract

The human substantia nigra (SN) is thought to consist of two functionally distinct neuronal populations-dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the pars compacta subregion and GABA-ergic neurons in the pars reticulata subregion. However, a functional dissociation between these neuronal populations has not previously been demonstrated in the awake human. Here we obtained microelectrode recordings from the SN of patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease as they performed a two-alternative reinforcement learning task. Following positive feedback presentation, we found that putative DA and GABA neurons demonstrated distinct temporal dynamics. DA neurons demonstrated phasic increases in activity (250-500 ms post-feedback) whereas putative GABA neurons demonstrated more delayed and sustained increases in activity (500-1000 ms post-feedback). These results provide the first electrophysiological evidence for a functional dissociation between DA and GABA neurons in the human SN. We discuss possible functions for these neuronal responses based on previous findings in human and animal studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 24%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Psychology 7 13%
Engineering 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,724,033
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#5,703
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,631
of 238,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#210
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.