You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00739 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bernadette T. Gillick, Adam Kirton, Jason B. Carmel, Preet Minhas, Marom Bikson |
| Abstract |
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated mainly in adults and doses may not be appropriate in pediatric applications. In perinatal stroke where potential applications are promising, rational adaptation of dosage for children remains under investigation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 21% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 16% |
| Psychology | 18 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 42 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,882,534
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,914
of 7,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,586
of 250,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#123
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.