↓ Skip to main content

Sleep spindle deficits in antipsychotic-naïve early course schizophrenia and in non-psychotic first-degree relatives

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sleep spindle deficits in antipsychotic-naïve early course schizophrenia and in non-psychotic first-degree relatives
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00762
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dara S. Manoach, Charmaine Demanuele, Erin J. Wamsley, Mark Vangel, Debra M. Montrose, Jean Miewald, David Kupfer, Daniel Buysse, Robert Stickgold, Matcheri S. Keshavan

Abstract

Chronic medicated patients with schizophrenia have marked reductions in sleep spindle activity and a correlated deficit in sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Using archival data, we investigated whether antipsychotic-naïve early course patients with schizophrenia and young non-psychotic first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia also show reduced sleep spindle activity and whether spindle activity correlates with cognitive function and symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 158 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 19%
Neuroscience 23 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 47 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,150,556
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#983
of 7,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,688
of 267,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#40
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.