You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Leveraging the “mad genius” debate: why we need a neuroscience of creativity and psychopathology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00771 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shelley Carson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| Ireland | 3 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 68% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 39% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2014.
All research outputs
#1,566,445
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#724
of 7,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,852
of 259,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#29
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.