You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disentangling the attention network test: behavioral, event related potentials, and neural source analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00813 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alejandro Galvao-Carmona, Javier J. González-Rosa, Antonio R. Hidalgo-Muñoz, Dolores Páramo, María L. Benítez, Guillermo Izquierdo, Manuel Vázquez-Marrufo |
| Abstract |
The study of the attentional system remains a challenge for current neuroscience. The "Attention Network Test" (ANT) was designed to study simultaneously three different attentional networks (alerting, orienting, and executive) based in subtraction of different experimental conditions. However, some studies recommend caution with these calculations due to the interactions between the attentional networks. In particular, it is highly relevant that several interpretations about attentional impairment have arisen from these calculations in diverse pathologies. Event related potentials (ERPs) and neural source analysis can be applied to disentangle the relationships between these attentional networks not specifically shown by behavioral measures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 21% |
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 54 | 34% |
| Neuroscience | 35 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,571,412
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,282
of 7,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,761
of 255,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#57
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.