You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is there a neuroanatomical basis of the vulnerability to suicidal behavior? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of structural and functional MRI studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00824 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kees van Heeringen, Stijn Bijttebier, Stefanie Desmyter, Myriam Vervaet, Chris Baeken |
| Abstract |
We conducted meta-analyses of functional and structural neuroimaging studies comparing adolescent and adult individuals with a history of suicidal behavior and a psychiatric disorder to psychiatric controls in order to objectify changes in brain structure and function in association with a vulnerability to suicidal behavior. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 27 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,483,718
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,626
of 7,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,527
of 262,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#108
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.