↓ Skip to main content

The brain’s response to pleasant touch: an EEG investigation of tactile caressing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The brain’s response to pleasant touch: an EEG investigation of tactile caressing
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00893
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harsimrat Singh, Markus Bauer, Wojtek Chowanski, Yi Sui, Douglas Atkinson, Sharon Baurley, Martin Fry, Joe Evans, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze

Abstract

Somatosensation as a proximal sense can have a strong impact on our attitude toward physical objects and other human beings. However, relatively little is known about how hedonic valence of touch is processed at the cortical level. Here we investigated the electrophysiological correlates of affective tactile sensation during caressing of the right forearm with pleasant and unpleasant textile fabrics. We show dissociation between more physically driven differential brain responses to the different fabrics in early somatosensory cortex - the well-known mu-suppression (10-20 Hz) - and a beta-band response (25-30 Hz) in presumably higher-order somatosensory areas in the right hemisphere that correlated well with the subjective valence of tactile caressing. Importantly, when using single trial classification techniques, beta-power significantly distinguished between pleasant and unpleasant stimulation on a single trial basis with high accuracy. Our results therefore suggest a dissociation of the sensory and affective aspects of touch in the somatosensory system and may provide features that may be used for single trial decoding of affective mental states from simple electroencephalographic measurements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Hungary 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 21%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 19%
Neuroscience 27 17%
Engineering 24 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,997,159
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,425
of 7,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,649
of 266,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#54
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.