↓ Skip to main content

EEG neurofeedback treatments in children with ADHD: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EEG neurofeedback treatments in children with ADHD: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00906
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi, Pierre Alexis Geoffroy, Guillaume Fond, Régis Lopez, Stéphanie Bioulac, Pierre Philip

Abstract

We undertook a meta-analysis of published Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) with semi-active control and sham-NF groups to determine whether Electroencephalogram-neurofeedback (EEG-NF) significantly improves the overall symptoms, inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity dimensions for probably unblinded assessment (parent assessment) and probably blinded assessment (teacher assessment) in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 272 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 17%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 48 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 15%
Neuroscience 35 12%
Computer Science 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 65 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,176,005
of 25,448,590 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#528
of 7,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,989
of 270,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#21
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,448,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.