You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
EEG neurofeedback treatments in children with ADHD: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00906 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi, Pierre Alexis Geoffroy, Guillaume Fond, Régis Lopez, Stéphanie Bioulac, Pierre Philip |
Abstract |
We undertook a meta-analysis of published Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) with semi-active control and sham-NF groups to determine whether Electroencephalogram-neurofeedback (EEG-NF) significantly improves the overall symptoms, inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity dimensions for probably unblinded assessment (parent assessment) and probably blinded assessment (teacher assessment) in children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 28% |
Netherlands | 3 | 7% |
Japan | 2 | 5% |
Canada | 2 | 5% |
France | 2 | 5% |
Spain | 2 | 5% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 70% |
Scientists | 9 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Russia | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 272 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 55 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 17% |
Researcher | 35 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
Other | 49 | 17% |
Unknown | 48 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 86 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 15% |
Neuroscience | 35 | 12% |
Computer Science | 14 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Other | 34 | 12% |
Unknown | 65 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,176,005
of 25,448,590 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#528
of 7,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,989
of 270,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#21
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,448,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.